Thursday, April 25, 2013

PAIN AND GAIN IS THE SPIRITUAL FOLLOW-UP TO SPRING BREAKERS

As much as it pains me to say it, Pain and Gain is much, much crazier than Spring Breakers. In my header I say it is the spiritual follow-up to that film, mainly because it is another film set in SoFlo about idiots making very bad decisions that involves heavy drug use and heavy stylization.

In Pain and Gain we follow meat-head personal trainer Daniel Lugo (Mark Whalberg). It is 1994 and the setting is Miami. Lugo wants to live the American Dream (he wants cars, girls, a fancy house and piles of moo-la), but he is strapped for cash and so comes up with a crazy plan: to kidnap someone, force them to give him everything they own, and then live that dream to the extreme. He puts together a team consisting of  Adrian Doorbal (Anthony Mackie) and Paul Doyle (Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson), both of which are clients of his. For his victim, Lugo sets his sights on another client named Victor Kershaw (Tony Shalhoub), a snobb-ish, rich asshole. Not everything goes according to plan, but the gang still wind up living that dreamed about life for a few months before they are caught and thrown in jail. Believe it or not, this is a goofy comedy, it's all true and it's directed by Michael Bay of all people.

Mark Whalberg does a pretty great job as Lugo, but the real standouts here are Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, Tony Shalhoub, and Ed Harris. Dwayne's Doyle is a Christ-loving and god-fearing man who just wants to do good, but isn't afraid to knock a motherfucker out if need be. Once he starts living the high-life, he turns to Cocaine and his life quickly spirals downwards as his new hobby completely takes control of his life. His best scenes are before he gets all coked up. It's great fun to watch Doyle try to convert the Jewish Kershaw to Christianity, and some of The Rock's lines and the way he delivers them are comedic gold. Shalhoub is also super-great as Kershaw, but you only truly start to like him after you see all the shit he goes through and how he is left with zip after his ordeal. It's great to watch as he struggles to put his life back together, while just about everybody refuses to believe what he went through. Ed Harris plays Ed DuBois, a P.I who takes up Kershaw's case and is the only non-comedic one in the bunch. He does a fantastic job as a man who's only concern is justice. He's probably the most lovable one of the bunch here and his last scene is pretty superb.

With Pain and Gain, Michael Bay has finally found his sweet spot. It is by no means a serious film. It's tons of high-octane, roid-filled, super-insane-o, goofy fun. That said, Bay portrays Lugo's gang (who act as the focus of the film) for what they truly are: low-level criminals who don't have a single brain cell among them. They are bad, rotten people. While it is easy to have fun with their scenes (mainly due to some HILARIOUS lines and scenarios), not once are we encouraged to root these bastards on. In fact, it actually feels good to watch these people get busted at the end of the film (No, this is not a spoiler. We see them arrested at the very start of the film). Bay does right here for a change, and while he certainly doesn't restrain himself here at all, Pain and Gain is still his best film yet. 

Pain and Gain is a film that moves along at a break-neck speed as it continually spirals into unbelievably insane heights. You won't believe what you are seeing on the big screen to be true, but sadly it all is, which makes the ultimate conclusion that much more rewarding. The bad guys get what they deserve. Pain and Gain is yet another film that explores a group's attempts at living the American Dream by doing bad things in order to fuel this lifestyle. With Sophia Coppola's Bling Ring out later this year (another film that focuses on the very same thing) it would appear we may be seeing the start of a new trend....I certainly hope so. Pain and Gain is a crazed, goofy, and super-fun roller-coaster ride of a film that enjoys throwing viewers through several insane loop-the-loops. It's easily the best comedy I have seen in a very long time. ALL HAIL BAY!

4 STARS out of 5

Oh yes, and Bar Paley has got one helluva perfect ass that Bay (as usual) LOVES to film. Ain't nothin' wrong with that!






Sunday, April 14, 2013

SMALLS TELLS EVIL DEAD TO FEAST ON THIS

While most claim this is a re-make, I see it as more of a continuation of the Evil Dead franchise.....maybe a bit of a reboot too. Why do I say this? Well, it's clear lots of evil, nasty shit has happened at this cabin presumably numerous times before the newest group consisting of your typical underdeveloped horror characters arrive on the scene. In fact, if you look close enough you may see some remnants of the crazy shit that went down in both The Evil Dead and Evil Dead 2.

In Evil Dead,we follow Mia (Jane Levy), her brother David (Shiloh Fernandez), his girlfriend Natalie (Elizabeth Blackmore), David's ex-best friend Eric (Lou Taylor Pucci), and Eric's girlfriend Olivia (Jessica Lucas). Mia has some serious drug dependency issues, and so the group has decided to shack up at Mia's family's cabin until she's able to kick her habit. While at the cabin, the group uncovers a creepy book. Eric, a  high school teacher, is intrigued and against his own better judgement opens the book and reads aloud some passages which awaken an ancient evil that proceeds to slowly take possession of the group one by one, starting with Mia. 

I honestly had trouble getting invested in this film, mainly because of some poor character work. We never learn much about the characters. We know Olivia is a nurse who thinks she knows everything, she's not very likeable. We know Natalie is David's kind and caring girlfriend, she's basically just there. David is a brother who has been mostly absent in Mia's life, he is trying to make amends. Mia is the much-put-upon sister who has had to deal with some hard times in her past (like having to care for her Alzheimer's plauged mother), we assume she turned to drugs for help coping with her life and to help erase her pain. Eric is a smart high school teacher who used to be BFs with David, but now resents David mainly due to David not being there for the group or for Mia. That's about it for character development. The plot isn't very complex or interesting either, though I did like it here (not that a film like this really needs a complex plot, but some real twists and turns wouldn't hurt.). 

Most of the cast does a decent job, with the standouts being Shiloh Fernandez as David, Lou Taylor Pucci as Eric, and Jane Levy as Mia. Shiloh Fernandez is likable in his role and does a fine job, but isn't all that memorable, and Mia's character isn't really in it except for the beginning and the very end, for most of the film her character is possessed so we aren't really watching Mia, we are actually watching a demon. Now, Levy is to be commended for pulling off her 3 roles (victim, demon, and heroine) with a good amount of believablity, and you can tell she really enjoyed her stint as main demon (probably her most memorable role in the film). That said, I really didn't care for Mia here, and that's not really the fault of Levy, but the fault of a weak script which has some snappy dialogue here and there (most of which belongs to Mia's demon character) but for the most part is just kind of there. I feel that the best character here is that of Eric, as portrayed by Lou Taylor Pucci, he is really put through the wringer here, but keeps trucking on nonetheless, he is also super likable and sympathetic. Eric is the only one I really didn't want to see die (and NO, I'm not telling if he makes it out in one piece).

Another problem with this film is that it has 3 Ash characters here: Mia, Eric, and David. I feel Eric most resembles Ash since he is the one who goes through the most shit in the film. David resembles Ash since he is the "hero" for most of the film, and Mia resembles Ash because she winds up being the main hero here, she gets to battle a demon, and she also suffers a similar injury (which I personally feel was crow-bared in, it was a bit too much in my opinion). If the film had chose one character to be the Ash of the group that would have been fine, but having 3 just weighs the film down, makes it look like the film can't make up it's mind, and makes the film weaker overall.

Ok, now onto the good stuff.....mainly, the gore! The gore and blood effects that appear in Evil Dead are pretty great. We get multiple mutilations and dismemberments, some nail gun and chainsaw fun, a pretty severe 3rd degree burn and some gruesome parts involving  a hypodermic needle, among many others. Evil Dead thinks being gory and bloody is scary....bad news: It's not, but it sure is fun (wow, am I desensitized? Probably). This is probably the most blood and gore I have seen in a film in a while. Unfortunately, every one of these scenes feels clean and a bit too polished. I would have preferred if these parts were a bit gritter to be completely honest....but hey, at least there is a lot of the stuff here (more than enough to satisfy any gore hound). I also enjoyed all the nods to the original classic like the Oldsmobile (which has seen better days), the necklace (which actually is given some pretty cool backstory here, backstory that makes it's use in the original films make sense), some classic lines, a double-barrel shot-gun, and a chainsaw among other things.

 Evil Dead's biggest accomplishment is that it perfectly captures/re-creates the tone of the first film. Yes it is super bloody and gory and icky, but these parts have an inherent sense of fun and playfulness to them. This is the kind of film you want to watch on a sleepover with friends. Evil Dead is far from a perfect remake, but for my money it is SLIGHTLY better than the original (helps that the effects found here are of a higher quality). While those looking for some serious scares are likely to be disappointed, those who came in seeking a fun, gory time will enjoy the hell out of this cool little flick. Sam Raimi and Bruce "The Man" Campbell would be proud (and they are, seeing as they are the main producers here). 

3/5 STARS





Saturday, April 6, 2013

JURASSIC PARK IN IMAX 3D IS A CINEPHILE'S WET DREAM

Jurassic Park is a film that has always been near and dear to my heart. Ever since I first saw it when I was young, I've had a certain fixation about the film.The idea of a Jurassic Park helped to spark my imagination, and the park itself is so full of potential that when it all ultimately falls to shit I can't help but share in Hammond's pain.  I would re-watch the film constantly when I was just a boy, and when I grew older and learned it was a novel I just had to read it, and that only served to further strengthen my love for this property (the film and the book are two entirely different beasts. They are both great, but in entirely different ways). I've seen the film and read the book countless times, and love each just about equally. When I learned that Jurassic Park was getting the 3-D treatment....and was going to be shown in the IMAX format no less, I decided that I couldn't let this golden opportunity pass through my fingers. This would be my first time ever seeing this classic in theaters, and it's forever changed the way I will look at this film. Jurassic Park is a film that was made to be seen on the biggest screen possible, it's the very definition of what a theatrical film should be. It's large, loud, bombastic, thrilling, all-encompassing, and audience engulfing.

For those not in the know (of which I hope there are very few), Jurassic Park follows Dr. John Hammond (played by an eccentric, starry-eyed, joyful, and foolishly idealistic Richard Attenborough), a wealthy creator of a very special biological preserve named Jurassic Park, which needs a few outside opinions before it can be officially opened to the public. Hammond calls upon "Rock Star" chaotician Dr. Ian Malcom (played to absolute perfection by Jeff Goldblum, who is clearly enjoying the hell out of playing this character), greedy lawyer Donald Gennaro (Martin Ferrero), Paleontologists Dr. Ellie Satler (Laura Dern) and her partner Dr. Alan Grant (Sam Neil, also perfect here), and Hammond's own grandchildren Tim (Joseph Mazzello) and Lex (Ariana Richards) for said outside opinions. Unfortunately, a disgruntled employee of the park (Dennis Nedry, played by none other than Newman himself, Wayne Knight) decides he has had enough and sabotages the park in an attempt to escape with some valuable information which a competing company wants, in the process freeing all the dino's. Now, with Jurassic Park thrown into a state of total chaos it's a race against time to restore power and order to the place (with the help of computer specialist Ray Arnold, portrayed here by an epic cigarette smoking Samuel L. Jackson, another actor who seems to having a great deal of fun here.....love that cigarette) , a task which proves to be herculean and maybe even pointless.....is it too late for Jurassic Park? Will anyone survive?

Jurassic Park is a landmark film that helped to change the way movies were made, it was one of the first films to show how useful CGI could be. While it is fun to look back at Jurassic Park as an almost metaphor for those times.....where outdated practical effects artists (paleontologists)  were slowly being replaced by computer artists (Hammond and crew) and the film looks at this through the eyes of the people on the way out. The cool thing most probably don't remember though, is that most of the effects done in the film are practical and not CGI. For example, a large portion of the T-Rex attack is done with a practical T-Rex animatronic.....the CGI is only used when practical effects would have been impractical or downright impossible to do the material justice. This is a large reason why the effects work so well, the CGI and practical effects work together to help build the illusion that these dinosaurs are actual, living breathing creatures.

Jurassic Park was a film whose intent was to make the audience feel like they are in the world of Jurassic Park, on the big screen this is all the more obvious. The way shots are framed, with elements in the foreground, midground and background help to establish a scene and place you inside it. Even small things like where the camera is set and angled help to place you into the world. There was only so far this attempted effect could go back in the day, Jurassic Park was a film that was just waiting to be converted into 3D and by god, those crazy bastards at Universal did it....they really did it and they did it beautifully. Somehow, the 3D team here worked with the original film and it's cinematography to craft a 3D experience which I would compare to Avatar, except done and executed a million times better. They didn't force the 3-D, but did it in a way so that it came off naturally. The 3-D is just about a perfect fit for the film as can be evidenced by the above stated fore, mid and background elements which combine to create not just a fantastic illusion of depth, but another illusion that most 3D films strive to achieve but rarely do.....that there is no screen or window in front of you. There is no separation between film and theater, they become one and we, the audience, find ourselves fully engulfed in the world of Jurassic Park. It took my breath away.

Every scene you expect to take your breath away does. The big reveal of Isla Nublar is breath-takingly beautiful and filled to the brim with depth (and that score, oh god that sweeping score), our introduction to the T-Rex paddock gave me chills thinking about what would occur there later and the mere look of the thing helped in the giving-me-serious-chills department too (those large electrical fences in that area....oh man, how different, unreal and scary they are in IMAX 3D), the T-Rex attack had me in jaw-dropped, knee shaking awe and terror (the T-Rex animatronic is a thing of pure beauty, and by god is that thing large!!!! Look at how big it's head is, it's mouth, it's teeth.....I'm still in shock. And I'm not kidding about my knees shaking, first film to ever make me do that. Not sure if it was out of pure terror or pure heart stopped awe or a mixture of these 2. Either way, the T-Rex attack works amazingly well in IMAX 3-D, really making the height difference between the kids and the T-Rex stand out in such a way that it increases our worry for them and their predicament), Dr. Grant's tree climb and narrow escape with Tim from a falling car was beautifully IN-YOUR-FACE/YOU-ARE-THERE, the first raptor attack inside the power generator with Ellie is perfect in it's dark, eerie intensity and that fist-pump inducing ending where the T-Rex gets to tear into those nasty raptors and then strikes that I AM THE KING pose and roars at the audience (You can't help but bow down after that). You know what, every single damned scene ROCKS in IMAX 3D, as I said earlier the whole film has a YOU ARE THERE, YOU ARE IN THIS WORLD feeling to it that really knocked my socks off.

Jurassic Park  has a somewhat surreal quality to it when viewed in IMAX 3D, with it's extreme close-ups of character's faces and computer screens made all the larger and bizarre when displayed on the downright gigantic IMAX screen. Extreme close-ups of people's heads make them seem to float or protrude just barely out of the screen, then there is the extreme close-ups of computer screens which seem downright imposing and even a bit frightening in IMAX. The extreme close-up shots of the dino's feet as they are chaisng after their prey is also super-impressive in IMAX 3D.  It also helps that the way scenes are filmed, and the lighting and set design help create this different world of bizarre but fascinating science that can be mysterious, intriguing and deadly (perfect example: the way the scene where Dennis steals the embryos looks on IMAX really does make it seem like we are in a bizarre new world). There is also a cool effect where Tim puts on those nifty night-vision goggles and due to the extreme close-up the camera uses it seems like he is peering into the theater for a few seconds. I guess my point here is that extreme close-ups in IMAX 3D are awesome.

Jurassic Park was a film that wasn't made to be seen on your blu-ray player. This monster was made to be seen on the biggest damn screen possible (Go big or go home guys). Jurassic Park is a celebration of cinema and everything that's good about this art form. On display here is a fairly strong script, fantastic acting all around, gorgeous cinematography, memorable monsters, and some kick-ass visual effects (both practical and CGI), not to mention it's also got some moments of quiet brilliance hidden inside. This is a film whose aim is to show audiences an explosive good time, but it can also be surprisingly smart and clever when it wants to be (it's not just a mindless blockbuster guys). While it wasn't made with 3-D in mind, it was THE perfect choice to convert into the format due to the way it was shot and the angles and swooping movements of the camera (oh, and because DINOSAURS!!!!). The IMAX 3D experience here is top-notch as it allows audiences to fully engulf themselves into the rich and fascinating world created here.  I don't cry easily, but when it came time to leave the theater I had to fight back some tears....I did not want to exit this world, I was not ready for this experience to end. Jurassic Park has always been and always will be one of the best, while seeing it in 3D is not mandatory for you to enjoy it (I'm sure that seeing it in  2D on the big screen is still enjoyable) I do recommend that you fork over the extra bucks for IMAX 3D, because as good as Jurassic Park is....it's even better in IMAX 3D, and the world you step into seems all the more real on that large IMAX screen. It's a one-of-a-kind experience that you shouldn't cheat yourself out of.

5 STARS- BETTER THAN SEX

BONUS NOTE: I did some digging, and apparently Sir Steven himself oversaw the 3D conversion here. No wonder it was so impressive!


Saturday, March 23, 2013

SPRING BREAK FOREVER: SMALLS REVIEWS SPRING BREAKERS

Spring Breakers is the latest cinematic outing from controversial film maker Harmony Korine. In Spring Breakers four college girls (Vanessa Hudgens plays Candy, Selena Gomez plays Faith, Ashley Benson plays Brit and Rachel Korine aka Harmony Korine's wife plays Cotty) grow tired and bored of their empty college campus and so decide to head off to Spring Break. Unfortunately, even with all the money they have saved they are still tragically short of the dough needed to live it up in SoFlo.....what's a girl to do? Why, don ski-masks, grab some water pistols and hammers and rob a restaurant of course! Before you can say YOLO, the four are livin the good life in St. Petersburg (in bikinis that they wear for the course of the whole film). It isn't long though until their apartment complex is raided for drugs and the four are arrested. Without the cash to post bail, the girls' party seems to have come to an abrupt halt. Right when things seem the darkest, a seemingly heaven-sent (this is where I try to suppress a giggle) benefactor in the guise of a wanna-be gangsta/rap artist named Alien (played with a gleeful, child-like joy by James Franco) comes to the rescue and bails the girls out, inviting them to shack up with him and in the process bringing them into his deadly, dangerous, crime-filled life.

The four lead actresses all do a pretty great job here, nailing the brainless idiocy that I've often run into around  sexed up/boozed up party girls, while managing to incorporate some great bi-polar traits into their characters. One second they're singing and dancing, and the very next they are re-enacting their classic heist in a parking lot immediately after which they dance joyfully off screen ...it's very off-putting and makes you shift a bit in your seat. It's hard not to smile with them, until suddenly you find that you are scared of them. Selena Gomez as Faith is probably the most well-balanced out of the four and definitely the most innocent and naive. She is a goody, religious girl that wants to go to Spring Break to experience something new and find out who she is (isn't that why all kids do drugs and go crazy?). She claims that she never wants to leave SoFlo once she arrives, but as soon as the cotton candy and bubblegum start to crust and bleed she is the first to bail. The scene where she breaks down is great acting on Gomez's part, you really believe her when she cries. There's not much personality among the other three to be completely honest. Candy, Cotty, and Brit are all deranged, party-going, sex-loving, dirty girls that appeared to be turned on by violence, booze, and drugs. Quite possibly one of the sweetest things about Spring Breakers is that these girls are clearly not aware of the power they wield when they fire off guns like they are toys. They have no idea what they are really doing, and this brings an innocent and naive but even more dangerous quality to them.

James Franco turns in what is quite possibly his best and most enjoyable performance yet as the weird but surprisingly lovable Alien. He is completely unrecognizable here, and he throws himself into his wacky role with such gusto, go-for-broke-ness that you can't help but love his character. Just about every line out of his mouth is instantly quotable ("I'm the motha-fuckin Death Star", "Look at my shit!", "Spring break fo' evah"). He's not just funny though, he is also surprisingly sincere at times. He really does care about these girls, he means it when he calls them his "motha-fuckin soul mates" and his "mermaids". In what is quite possibly hands-down the best scene in the film, he tries to bear his soul to them by singing a heart-felt and hilarious rendition of Everytime by Britney Spears, who he considers an "angel" and an "underrated artist". The girls (wearing ridiculous looking pink ski-masks and toting guns) go all giggly and dance and twirl around with their guns like wanna-be ballerinas, which then cuts to a montage of them robbing various people and even beating the snot out of a few of them.  When Alien sings the song, it's clear that he means every word he sings, but we laugh any ways mainly out of the ridiculousness of the situation but also because HE'S BEING SINCERE (kind of hard to believe, but hey, it's kind of sweet...and silly). James Franco should definitely get a Best Supporting Actor nod for his role here, he is absolutely fearless.

The cinematography by Benoit Debie and film editing by Douglas Crise is fantastic. We get plenty of close-ups (mainly of the crotch and butt area) of women's bikinis, close-ups of women's breasts, transitions via gun sounds, some looping dialogue, and some great atmosphere and pacing is established as well. Korine said in an interview on The AV Club that he wanted to "Make a film that looked like it was lit with candies, like we were lighting it with Skittles or Starburst Fruit Chews...I wanted you to be able to feel like you could touch it or lick it." I'd say that he succeeds here, even though it's not all candy colors, there are also parts that feel like bright, multi-colored vomit....a lot of the film feels dirty and grungy, and I LOVED it!!!

The score here by maestros Skrillex and Cliff Martinez is just about perfection. I'm surprised no one thought about mixing these two artists together before now. Skrillex's Scary Monsters and Nice Sprites is the anthem for Spring Breakers, and the title of the song also nicely sums up the film as well. They are a perfect match for the film, and Skrillex actually steps it up here, delivering something that I've never quite heard from him before. I'd say that it would make for a great buy on ITunes and it fits the film perfectly, capturing the dark edges, longing,  and sadness found within the film.

Korine has several things to say in Spring Breakers, and he's not exactly subtle in the way he goes about saying it....mainly by some somewhat too on-the-nose dialogue. Yes, the script isn't all great and the narrative structure isn't particularly strong. The film flashes back and forth between scenes with flashy montages, fast edits, and looping dialogue interspersed between. The whole thing is clearly meant to be representative of a music video. Korine said that he wanted the film to be like a drug trip...well, once again congratulations Korine...you have succeeded brilliantly. Spring Breakers resembles a mix between a music video, a drug trip, and a dream turned nightmare.

Spring Breakers is a film that neither condones nor condemns ( it's also NOT about the loss of innocence or corruption of innocence). It feels like Harmony Korine traveled to Spring Break and brought his camera along for the ride, showing us what he found there. It all feels very real. The great irony about Spring Breakers is that it's really not about Spring Break at all, but is instead about the Spring Break Generation, or Generation Y as most call it. The film paints a fairly accurate portrait of this generation and Korine is making a comment about this generation here. Spring Breakers is about a generation that was raised on MTV and the promise of Spring Break. It's a generation that wants it all and none of the responsibilities that come with it. It's a generation that hasn't been able to really define itself. The kids of this generation (myself included) are lost, they long for something....anything and since TV says party's,  drugs and sex is the way to live that's what they want.  There are no villains in this film, only victims. Alien was told by TV and culture that he should want to be a gangsta, that he should want to be bad....so he follows that sermon and turns himself into that. The Television and culture tells Candy, Cotty, Brit, and Faith that they should want to party, fuck, drink, and snort....so they do. Each of these characters (except for two) decide in the end that they never want Spring Break to end (even when it has already clearly ended and most have gone home), and they go to some pretty dark places to keep their dream alive and it changes and morphs them. What are the consequences of this type of lifestyle, is it worth it in the end? Alien says they are living the American Dream....and in a sad sort of way, they are.

Spring Breakers is bubblegum pop cinema mixed with trashy MTV inspired goodness that actually has some substance to it and isn't all surface. To quote another underrated artist, "it's the best of both worlds". The result is something that's equal parts enjoyable and uncomfortable. Spring Breakers is a challenging, raw, gritty, sad, sexy, scary, disturbing and real film.  It's a film that keeps you alert, awake, and shifting in your seat for the duration of its run time. While definitely not for everyone, I still think that everyone should see this since it's actually kind of important. Spring Breakers is sure to stay with you, whether you want it to or not.

4.5 STARS

BONUS NOTES

Harmony Korine is indeed a perv.

Each of the girls is mighty yummy in their bikinis, even though only Rachel Korine and Vanessa Hudgens take theirs off. (There are also various extras that take it off for the camera)

The perfect film to eat Skittles while you watch.

Would make a great double feature with Project X, though the 2 films are more different than they are similar.

The first 20 minutes is pure Spring Break, after this though the film gets considerably darker and more intense.

I can't get Everytime out of my head now.














CHARLIE BARTLETT MAKES SMALLS WONDER IF HE COULD BE A PSYCHIATRIST

Charlie Bartlett is the story of bight, charismatic 17 year old Charlie Bartlett (Anton Yelchin) who yearns for popularity since that's what high school is all about (no really, it is!). In his attempts to gain the respect and love of his high school's student body, Charlie becomes the self-appointed shrink of the school and soon everyone is popping pills like candy. Principal Nathan Gardner (Robert Downey Jr.) is almost immediately a bit nervous about Charlie, but his distrust soon turns into a strong dislike when Charlie starts dating his daughter Susan (Kat Dennings). With his boss breathing down his back and Charlie's popularity booming, Principal Gardner is going to have to make a decision.

Anton Yelchin has always been one of my favorite up-and-comers, and he shines here as the kind-hearted if not a bit mischievous Charlie. I don't know what else to say about Yelchin here except that he did a superb job (as always) and that his character was well developed, super likeable and three dimensional. Robert Downey Jr. is great as always as principal Nathan Gardner,  who is torn down the middle about Charlie. He sees that Charlie is trying to do the right thing, but Charlie is undermining his authority and not to mention he's getting a little too close to comfort to his daughter, Susan. Kat Dennings is hot as Susan, Charlie's love interest and Principal Nathan's daughter. She is also well built and three dimension (like every other lead character here). Dennings does a great job, and I could ogle her tits all day, even when they are fully clothed.

Charlie Bartlett is a great, clever, and endearing coming of age tale that has some cool pearls of wisdom hidden within. Every actor here does a fantastic job, and it's always fun to see Yelchin and RDJ go toe-to-toe. Charlie Bartlett is a film made for the ADHD Generation, and as such it succeeds with style, wit, and humor.

4.5 Stars

Saturday, March 16, 2013

FOR A GOOD TIME, SMALLS PRESCRIBES SIDE EFFECTS

Girls are crazy, drugs are complicated, and Jude Law is awesome.

In Side Effects, Dr. Jonathon Banks (Jude Law) finds his life crumbling at the seams when he prescribes hopelessly depressed Emily Taylor (Rooney Mara) a new anti-depressant by the name of Ablixa. Unfortunately, the drug seems that it may have a few bugs as Emily winds up brutally murdering her husband (Channing Tatum), claiming she has no recollection of those events afterwards and is shortly placed in a mental ward. Running out of people to blame, the finger is inevitably pointed at Dr. Banks who soon finds himself out of a job and his family life on the rocks. Desperate to reclaim his life, Dr. Banks decides to investigate the murder and finds that there may be more to this case than meets the eye.

Jude Law easily proves that he is a force to reckoned with as Dr. Jonathon Banks, the sympathetic psychiatrist that the film centers around. He is a good doctor, one who cares about his patients and really does want to help them. Law does the whole backed into a corner thing incredibly well, as everybody seems to be out to tear the poor guy down. I was on his side for the whole film (it's really hard not to like this guy...he's just so nice), and it's fun to see him first reactively lash out in an attempt to protect himself, and then buckle down as he decides to use his brains and surprisingly apt detective skills to solve his problem. He is a great character here, and he once again shows that he is indeed a versatile actor.

Catherine Zeta-Jones plays a fantastic bitch here, as Dr. Victoria Siebert, Emily's old psychiartist that may hold the key to this complex puzzle. She seems to be leading the charge against Dr. Banks, for whatever reason and it's clear that she won't stop until his life is in ruins. She is a fairly complicated character here, and Jones pulls it off easily, seeming to enjoy being a meanie.

Rooney Mara is superb as always in the role of apparent victim Emily Taylor, but is she really as innocent as she seems? Mara has several roles to play here, and she pulls all off with a professional ease, never once showing the audience her real hand. She is heart-breakingly beautiful as ever in the film, and it's hard not to sympathize with her character at first....her life seems to have been destroyed by forces beyond her control. Of course, if things really are as they seem is the big question here and naturally all is answered by the end of this film.

Side Effects is a smart, well-crafted thriller that is twisty and fun as hell. It starts out as a thriller about the pharmaceutical industry, turns into paranoid thriller, then becomes a detective thriller before finally bringing all three of these together as the truth is finally revealed (Trust me, you WON'T see this one coming). It's rare to see such a great film being released so early in the year, but already Side Effects has become one of the best films of 2013. It's smart, well-crafted, superbly acted, and not at all what it appears to be. It's a fun ride that I would gladly take again. If this really is Steven Soderberg's last theatrical film, he chose to go out on a high note. If you like your thrillers classy and smart, then Side Effects fits the bill.

4 STARS


Friday, March 1, 2013

SMALLS LOVES LO

 Lo is an extremely different kind of Rom-Com. It's gruesome, bizarre, and completely unique. In Lo, sad-sack Justin (Ward Roberts) loses the girl of his dreams April (Sarah Lassez) when she is forcibly dragged to hell by demon Jeez (Devin Barry). Devastated, angry, and desperate, Justin summons a demon named Lo (Jeremiah Birkett) to help him rescue her. As their quest drags on, Justin realizes that there may be more to April than meets the eye.

I really hate calling this film a rom-com, I feel that labeling this film as such is doing the film a great disservice. However, at the end of the day Lo is indeed a rom-com but it doesn't feel like one, after all....how many rom-coms deal with demons, torture, and hell?

Most actors do a pretty great job here. Ward Roberts as Justin is likeable and pathetic (exactly as he should be....though he does pull an Ash from The Evil Dead a bit too often), Sarah Lassez as April is hot and quirky, and Devin Barry as Jeez is surprisingly wacky for a demon. By far though, the best character and the main reason to see this film is Lo. Jeremiah Birkett is simply fantastic as the titular demon. He's funny when he needs to be, extremely likable, and also manages to be pretty scary at some points. You never know whose side he's really on or what his real game is and that's one of the reasons you just can't take your eyes off him. He is a joy to watch and is absolutely awesome.

The makeup and effects for the demons are pretty good too, managing to be pretty gruesome and disgusting. This film definitely does not shy away from the darker aspects of the story as well, a plus. That said, the film does try to balance things out by throwing in some real wackiness that at times just doesn't gel with the rest of the film (like a demon musical number and a bickering couple that has been condemned to be tortured in hell for all eternity).

Lo is a refreshingly different kind of film. I can honestly say that I've never seen anything quite like it, and how often can you say that about a film these days? While some of the comedy is just too wacky, most of the film works really well due to a great core story and the titular character of Lo. What's more, it actually has some genuine emotion and a fantastic and satisfying ending as well. I'm happy to say that Lo is a real winner. Seek this film out and watch it, I'd bet you will be glad you did.

4 STARS