Friday, October 14, 2022

FRIGHT FEST: HALLOWEEN ENDS

  Will evil die tonight?


 This review attempts to avoid spoilers while staying truthful to what this film really is. The best way to walk in is knowing as little as you can about it. That said, if you want to trek deeper, follow me into the sewers of Haddonfield. Evil is waiting...

  Halloween Ends is the story of Corey Cunningham (Rohan Campbell), a young adult scorned by the town of Haddonfield after the death of a child he was babysitting back in 2019. The year is now 2022, and Corey is struggling to keep it together. Help comes when he befriends Allyson (Andi Matichak) and Laurie (Jamie Lee Curtis). It's been four years since Michael's killing spree in Halloween Kills, and The Shape has vanished but the town hasn't forgotten his legend. When Corey has a close call with Michael, everything changes.

  Halloween Ends is the finale for David Gordon Green's Halloween sequel trilogy. It's penned by David Gordon Green, Paul Brad Logan, Chris Bernier, and Danny McBride. Ends is one of the most different, original, and unique entries in the franchise. It's also certain to be one of the most divisive. This film makes some ballsy, bold, unexpected, and surprising choices that will likely alienate or even anger many fans.

  Jamie Lee Curtis is back as Laurie, and puts on her strongest performance as the character since the original Halloween (Way back in '78). In this finale, she has worked to put Michael behind her. She's bought her own house and is working on a memoir.  

  Her granddaughter Allyson is now living with her and is working as a nurse at Haddonfield Memorial. Laurie has quite a few voice-overs, and they are all pretty stellar, accentuating themes about dealing with trauma, resisting/denying evil, and moving on/ healing. This feels closer to the Laurie we saw in John Carpenter's Halloween, and it's great to finally have her back.

 Andi Matichak is still pretty good as Allyson, but doesn't stand out as much as in previous installments. She's still likable, but hides an undercurrent of anger and frustration. She winds up falling hard for Corey, and the two’s relationship is focused on a good deal. 

  Surprisingly, the strongest part of Halloween Ends is likely Rohan Campbell as the meek good-boy guy-next-door Corey Cunningham (Who prefers chocolate milk over alcohol). Corey acts as our "protagonist" this go-round, and Ends deeper explores the character of Michael through Corey and his connection with The Shape. These parts are quietly, subtly clever and pretty interesting. 

  Rohan plays his role to perfection (or pretty close to perfection). He is very believable and likable as a genuinely good person who has started to develop a darker side from the events that transpired during his fateful babysitting gig in 2019. The only real downsides to his character are two of the turns he takes come across as sudden and abrupt. They don’t fully make sense.

  Those that buy a ticket hoping to watch a film about Michael and Laurie are going to be very disappointed. Michael is important to the events of Ends, but is treated more as an after-thought. He does do some killing, but only really appears in around a handful (maybe more) of scenes. 

  Don't expect to be frightened or intimated by The Shape here. When we pick up with ol' Mikey Boy, he has definitely seen better days. His home (The Meyers House) has been demolished, and his wounds/injuries from Kills (as well as his age) have finally caught up with him. He is a shade of his former self. 

  The previous two entries tried to establish Michael as more flesh-and-blood than boogeyman, but Ends does a complete 180 and chooses to go a more supernatural route with the character (think Curse of Michael Meyers). 

  Ends more-or-less discards most of the development and themes from 2018 and Kills, making this finale feel disconnected to and separate/distant from what came before. That said, the new path David Gordon Green and crew decide to tread isn't necessarily a bad one. 

  Ultimately the execution and run-time do Halloween Ends in. The new themes and ideas aren't given the adequate time to be properly or fully explored, and the third act feels pretty rushed (Also, In the first act there's a character from Kills that is shown to have somehow survived Michael's attempted murder of them, though how this person didn't succumb to their wounds is impossible to understand). 

  Luckily, the final fight between Michael and Laurie is A+. It might top the final fight in H20 for some. The opening sequence was stellar as well. It might be the best since the original Halloween. The way Michael and Laurie's story finally concludes is a bit anti-climactic, and it's difficult to imagine how they could plan any further sequels or spin-offs (unless they just started over from scratch, maybe).

  In the end, Halloween Ends resembles a mixture of Christine, Carrie, The Cult of Thorn trilogy (specifically Curse of Michael Meyers), and Mr. Brooks. Many will likely view it as the Jason Goes To Hell of the Halloween franchise. For my money, this isn't the worst Halloween film (that honor still goes to Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Meyers) but it will undoubtedly be the most divisive since Rob Zombie's Halloween 2. 

  Halloween 2018 was a love letter to John Carpenter's Halloween. Halloween Kills was a love letter to Halloween 2 (the first sequel) and Halloween 4: The Return of Michael Meyers, Halloween Ends feels like more of a love letter to the ending of Halloween 4,  Halloween 5: The Revenge of Michael Meyers, Halloween 6: The Curse of Michael Meyers, and even Halloween 3:Season of the Witch (The opening credits are done in blue, much like Halloween 3's. This was likely done to immediately and subconsciously send the message to the audience that this finale is going to be something completely different). 

  Halloween Ends takes a huge, admirable swing for the fences. It's hard not to appreciate the filmmakers' decision to opt to go for the road less traveled, giving us something no one was expecting (or likely wanted). This last outing is filled with surprising, bold choices. Unfortunately, it doesn't fully hit the mark.

  Personally, I really liked Ends but can imagine the overwhelming response will be anger and disappointment. There aren't many kills (most occur off-screen, or the film cuts away from them. There are a total of two stand-out deaths. ) and Michael isn't in it much. 

  Ends acts as more of a character study and moody introspection piece. It's not bad, but it is baffling. While I liked it, those that don't will have valid reasons for their hate. The discussion and discord over this one will certainly be interesting. Halloween Ends is one of the most unique experiences you will have in a theater this year, and for that it earns a recommendation.

3.5 STARS




Monday, September 12, 2022

FRIGHT FEST: JAWS IN 3-D

  The first film to ever bust the block is back on the big screen in a way like you’ve never seen it before… IN 3-D!!! Jaws is still one of the few completely flawless films out there. Luckily, the 3-D to be sampled here only enhances the experience.

  Re-watching Jaws today, it confounds the mind that this was Spielberg’s first theatrical film. The script, camerawork, cinematography, and acting are all superb. It feels like an expert, experienced, confident hand is behind the camera. You would never be able to tell that the shoot was incredibly problematic (The film went over-time and over-budget, and the shark animatronic was notoriously unreliable). The multiple themes about man vs. nature, warring masculinities, and class differences among many others are still rich and interesting. 

  Much like Jurassic Park in IMAX 3-D, the use of fore, mid, and background elements make this flick a natural fit for the format.  The shot placement and camera movement are incredibly impressive and work well with 3-D. There’s a good amount of screen-penetrating shots: waves and the ocean consistently stretch out into the audience, parts of the Orca occasionally protrude out of the screen, guns will point into the audience, and at the end when the shark jumps out of the water it looks like he’s eating the screen. 

  There’s an incredible amount of depth added throughout as well: shots of the beach and Ocean are very impressive, the Ben Gardner’s boat scene is gorgeous, every shot looking up at or down from the Orca’s crows nest is beautiful, and the shots of Quint standing at the very tip of the Orca with his harpoon gun resting in front of him are impressive. 

  The 3-D job here is exceptional and immersive. I didn’t think the film would be a good fit for 3-D, I was wrong. Jaws in 3-D is about as memorable an experience as Jurassic Park in IMAX 3-D was, which is to say: It’s great!

5 STARS

FRIGHT FEST: BARBARIAN

  Welcome back, creatures of the night, to Fright Fest. Your Ghost Host with the most most has some frightful things planned for this year's edition, including reviews for the rest of the Psycho franchise, so get PSYCHED!  For the first review though, I book a stay at an Airbnb with Barbarian.


  In Barbarian, Tess (Georgina Campbell) rents a house in Detroit on AirBnb, only to find a guy named Keith (Bill Skarsgard) is already staying there when she arrives. Keith invites Tess to stay there with him, and despite giving off some odd vibes, Tess takes him up on the offer. It won't take long before Tess realizes that Keith is the least of her worries.

  Having just left an unhealthy relationship, Tess is in town for a research gig that a famed documentarian needs help with. Tess wonders why it's always the girls who get their hearts ripped out, and doesn't want to be seen as a "pet". Georgina Campbell plays her "Final Girl" role to absolute perfection. She is a survivor type that kicks ass, but also cares about others she encounters during her nightmarish adventure. Campbell makes for a very memorable and likable heroine.

  Bill Skarsgard plays "nice guy" Keith. He gives off his signature odd vibes, but slowly manages to disarm audiences with a natural, nervous charm. Skarsgard plays his role very well. By this point, audiences should be well aware of the roles he is typically cast in and it's hard not to suspect him of ill intent. Keith doesn't get much character development (for example: Why is he staying in such a dangerous part of town? What brings him to Detroit?),  but Skarsgard makes the most out of what he is given to work with. 

  Justin Long plays AJ, another guy who finds himself trapped in the same nightmare as Tess. He wants to believe he is a good guy, but his behavior is questionable. It's always a joy to see Long on the big screen in a horror film, and he has fun with his role. AJ is fairly goofy and not easy to like, but he remains consistently entertaining.

  Barbarian is directed and written by Zach Cregger. Cregger got his start in comedy as one of the founding members of 'The Whitest Kids You Know'. Anna Drubich does the score, and it's one of the stand-out aspects of the film. The score is filled with tasty synth, and feels 80s-esque at the best of times. 

  Cregger directs with a very aggressive style and, in his hands Barbarian is a real puzzle box of a film. It's always twisting, turning, shifting, and changing. It takes great joy in consistently subverting expectations. (It's like trying to keep a firm grasp on a slippery eel.) . It's hard to catch your footing or really make out exactly what Barbarian is, what it's trying to say, and where it's headed. 

  While Barbarian is mostly dark, disturbing, gruesome, and messed up, there are plenty of moments that come across as comedic. There are some questions that remain unanswered and some story threads that aren't fully elaborated on. The themes and messages aren't super-deep either. 

  Barbarian deals heavily with themes of maternal love, toxic relationships, "nice guys", and "monsters". Much like 'The People Under the Stairs', not everyone is who they appear to be at first glance. This is Cregger's first solo theatrical outing, and it's fairly impressive and well-made. It all feels very grindhouse. 

  Barbarian is aggressively different, unique, and original. The same can be said for it's structure. There are messages and themes to ponder, but the real draw is the intense, unrelenting roller-coaster ride this flick takes audiences on.


4 STARS

Sunday, August 28, 2022

THE BRILLIANCE OF NOPE

 Well, Nope is now available to rent on demand, and to celebrate I've decided to do a deeper dive into the film, it's many themes, as well as the Gordy's Home scene and why it is vital to Nope as a whole. This is going to be more free-form and ramble-y, so please bear with me. MAJOR spoilers follow.

THEMES

Let's start with one of the other themes in the film that doesn't have to do with spectacle or exploitation of animals. Nope deals with characters that are fighting to not be forgotten. The Haywoods are at the forefront. They are a family of horse wranglers whose lineage comes from "Hollywood royalty" as their great-great-great granddad was the "man on a horse" in the famous Muybridge Experiment aka the first ever moving picture. With their patriarch 'Pops' recently deceased, the family business has fallen on hard times and they've resorted to selling their horses to a nearby wild west theme park owned by former child star Ricky "Jupe" Park. The Haywoods are in danger of being forgotten, their important legacy to film erased.

Antler Holst (Who's last name is a nod to Gustav Holst, a famous composer. He is most well known for orchestrating several pieces that are collectively known as 'The Planets'. Each piece is named after a planet, including Jupiter.) is introduced as a "world famous cinematographer"...yet the first time we see him, he is working on a commercial. This does not bode well for Antlers. Why would a "world famous" cinematographer be reduced to doing commericals unless his work (and prospects) have dried up? He and his work are in danger of being forgotten. Later on, Antlers uses an IMAX camera to capture footage of the UAP. This is clever, as every scene involving the UAP was shot using IMAX cameras. Angel is a lowly tech service agent at Fry's Electronics who is very interested in Aliens and UAPs. He has just recently been dumped by his girlfriend for a role on a CW show. He has also been discarded and forgotten about. 

Ricky "Jupe" Park is a former child star who's status as a minority was exploited as a youth to put butts-in-seats. He starred in a famous film franchise called 'Kid Sherriff' and in an ill-fated tv sitcom called 'Gordy's Home' that centered around a chimp. As an adult, Jupe uses his former child-stardom to coast by and earn bucks. Now discarded by the system that exploited him as a youth, he has resorted to continuing to exploit himself and the shows he starred in for monetary gain out of the fear of being forgotten. 

As you can see the commentary on Hollywood is rich and fairly savage. The movie-making industry is painted as a thoughtless, careless, exploitative industry that uses people and animals for it's own profit. It uses them up, spits them out, and discards them when they are no longer of use. Also interesting to note that 'Jupiter's Claim' revolves around the use and sharing of 'Jupe Jangles', the form of currency used to purchase different experiences and items in 'Jupiter's Claim'. 'Jupe Jangles' are fake gold coins that are ultimately of no value, yet people are encouraged to collect as many as possible and use them to "purchase" stuff and experiences.

Nope was advertised as a spectacle, and it's commenting on and critiquing spectacles. We, the audience, have bought tickets to view a spectacle. The film asks audiences to consider what role they play in paying to watch a spectacle. By buying tickets, are we perpetuating the cycle of spectacle? Are we encouraging more spectacles to be created? 

There's a cool scene at a restaurant later on where OJ, Emerald, and Angel are sitting around, eating, and discussing what to do next. Meanwhile, outside the restaurant a fight has broken out. I can't speak for everyone, but my eyes were inevitably drawn to the fight in the background. This is yet another commentary on spectacle. We should be watching and paying attention to the important conversation going on right in front of us, but the spectacle of the fight distracts us and draws our attention away.

Another thing to note is that whenever the UAP is around, all electronics fail, meaning our protagonists have to resort to more conventional means to capture footage of it. They start with fancy digital recorders, progress on to a hand-cranked IMAX camera utilizing film, and finally on to polaroid pictures. In a weird way, it's almost like a journey into the past of movie-making, progressively traveling deeper and deeper back in time. It's kind of perfect our heroes capture "The Oprah Shot" on polaroid seeing as this kind of stuff is incredibly hard to fake using that method. By choosing to highlight older methods of capturing moving images as well as the use of film reels, Peele is also advocating for a return to the old style of filmmaking. This makes Nope both a critique of the Hollywood system as well as a love letter to old movies (not to mention, Nope might as well be a classic western). 

The script in Nope is possibly Jordan Peele's most subtle yet. It's incredibly intelligent, and there are lines that reference future events in the film that are impossible to pick up on until repeated viewings. There are constant 'nopes' and 'yeps' throughout ( a memorable example is when OJ asks his sister Emerald if there's a word for a bad miracle and she responds with "nope".) and many reference to looking up and looking at people and things (After Angel lets out a frustrated scream upon first entering the Haywood property, OJ tells him "Hey, look at me".).  There are many close-ups of eyes in the B-Roll footage that Antlers Holst is inspecting later on. When Emerald is recalling the loss of her chance to train her beloved horse named Jean Jacket she says something along the lines of "He (Pops) never looked up at me...but you (OJ) did". There's also a hand gesture that OJ and Emerald share that symbolizes the phrase "I see you".

Early in the film, Emerald states she rides motorcycles which comes into play in a big way later on when she rides a motorcycle to evade the UAP. The design of the fake aliens Jupe has his three boys play are similar to monkeys. It's very likely Jupe drew upon his traumatic childhood experience on the set of 'Gordy's Home' to aid in the design of these "aliens". Another cool aspect of Nope is the the original title of the film was "Little Green Men", in reference to the collective societal image of aliens as well as money (which has literal little green men featured on the front of bills). When OJ has his sit-down with Jupe about buying back some of his horses, Jupe pivots to discussion about 'Gordy's Home' when Emerald notices a framed Mad Magazine cover (in reference to Peele's start on Mad TV). It's quite likely Jupe saw her interest as a way to change the topic of conversation, as he probably didn't want to discuss selling back the horses as most if not all had likely been fed to the UAP at that point. Jupe also states his interest in buying the Haywood property and all the horses on it. This is so he would have a larger food supply for the UAP and wouldn't have to keep forking out money for individual horses.

There is speculation as to whether or not OJ was eaten by the UAP at the end. One piece of evidence pointing to OJ surviving is the lyric from "Purple People Eater" Antlers Holst chooses to sing: "Well he came down to Earth and laid in a tree, I said Mr. Purple People Eater, don't eat me. I heard him say in a voice so gruff, I wouldn't eat you 'cause you're so tough." The last we see of OJ before the final scene, he is locked in an intense stare-down with the UAP. It's possible that it decided not to eat OJ because he refused to back down and came across as "tough".

At the end of the final scene after the UAP has been vanquished, Jupe's recorded farewell to guests at 'Jupiter's Claim'  can also be seen as a farewell to audiences watching Nope. "Ok cowboys and cowgirls, it's time to ride off into the sunset. That's right, happy trails. It's closing time. You don't have to go home, but you can't stay here. Till then, we wish you well. Hasta la vista, adios."

This doesn't have much to do with themes or motifs, but I still can't overstate how incredibly impressed I am with the "twist" this time around. The choice to have the flying saucer/UAP be a living extraterrestrial animal is simple but brilliant. It blows my mind no one had come up with this take/concept before. Really....why COULDN'T the flying saucer be an alien itself?

THE STAR LASSO EXPERIENCE

In the infamous 'Star Lasso Experience' scene, Jupe says to the gathered crowd something along the lines of: "In around an hour, you will leave here changed" and "As I said before, in a little less than an hour, you will leave here different". He utters these lines 1 hour and 6 minutes and then 1 hour 8 minutes into the film. Nope itself is 2 hours and 3 minutes long, making this line applicable to Nope itself. 

When Jupe first describes the 'Gordy's Home' incident he says it lasted for 6 minutes and 13 seconds, during the 'Star Lasso Experience' scene he says the UAP first appeared to him at 6:13 pm. It's stated early on that Pops died around 6 months before the time of the events seen in the majority of Nope. When it's revealed the UAP has been hiding in an unmoving cloud, OJ muses "Come to think of it, I've probably been staring at the same cloud for the past 6 months".  Jupe states that the UAP first appeared to him 6 months ago. All this points to the scene of Pops death likely being quite close to the first time the UAP appeared in the Agua Dulce Canyon (the setting for the entirety of Nope). 

Right before The UAP eats everyone at the 'Star Lasso Experience', Jupe's wife says "Bear with us, wild animals can be unpredictable". She says this in reference to the horse Jupe plans on feeding to the UAP refusing to leave it's stable (which could be seen as the reason why the UAP decides to hover over the 'Star Lasso Experience' and eat everyone there). This line, in larger context, is directly referring to the UAP which is a wild, unpredictable animal (hence why it eats everyone there). 

GORDY'S HOME

And now, we get to one of the most argued about and disputed segments of the film...the 'Gordy's Home' incident. Many are claiming this portion should have been cut completely as it doesn't add anything to the film. I couldn't disagree more as this portion is vital and integral to the numerous themes within Nope, and directly relates and informs events (as well a foreshadowing future events) during the present day parts of Nope.

Gordy's home follows a family that works at NASA in Cape Canaveral, Florida. The mother is an astronaut, and the father is a NASA scientist/engineer. They have their own daughter, chose to adopt a young Asian male (Jupe), and have a chimp that was a part of the flight program named Gordy. During a recording of an episode of the second season titled "Gordy's Birthday" one of the chimps (named Eli) playing Gordy is startled by one of the birthday balloons popping and goes into a savage and terrifying homicidal rage. It's very possible no one was killed during the rampage (Reports claim the mother lost three fingers, the father and daughter were savagely beaten with the daughter's face being eaten, and Jupe was left untouched but with severe psychological trauma. Gordy was killed while distracted by the discovery of Jupe hiding). 

Gordy is a wild animal that people attempted to tame with the goal of exploitation for entertainment, "spectacle", and profit. The efforts fail as one of the chimps goes bananas and assaults the actors on set. The chimp is ultimately killed. The UAP is a wild extra-terrestrial animal that people (OJ, Emerald, Angel, Antlers Holst, and Jupe) try to tame for entertainment, "Spectacle", and monetary gain. The efforts fail as the UAP goes ballistic and starts eating and killing many innocent people. The UAP is ultimately killed/vanquished. See any similarities?

The balloon popping is what set Eli the Chimp off, and the Jupe inflatable popping at the end is what kills the UAP. Jupe is saved from Eli's wrath because he is unable to make direct eye contact with the chimp due to a green table cloth which partially shields the boys eyes. When the UAP is attempting to stare down the Jupe inflatable/balloon at the end, we get a point of view from the UAP's perspective where a part of the UAP colored green is partially concealing it's view, mimicking that same shot from 'Gordy's Home'. When the UAP eats the Jupe inflatable, the last thing we see before it "pops" is the fist of the Jupe inflatable reaching out towards the camera similar to a fist-bump. During the 'Gordy's Home' incident, Jupe and Eli are reaching out to fist bump each other right before Eli has his brains blown out by a gun (An "exploding fist-bump", much like Jupe references earlier). 

This scene doesn't necessarily move the plot forward, but it informs the Jupe character, the decisions he makes, the many themes found within the film, as well as foreshadowing many future events later on. Without the 'Gordy's Home' incident included, Nope as a whole would be much weaker. It's stronger for it's inclusion.

CONCLUSION

As mentioned in my main review of Nope, this is Jordan Peele's Jaws. it follows the efforts of a small group and their efforts involving a territorial, hungry animal. Except instead of the ocean, it's the sky. Instead of a shark, it's an extraterrestrial animal. Instead of the group trying to stop the animal's eating frenzy, they try to exploit it. I've seen Nope a total of four times, and this is still only a fraction of the things I've picked up on in the film. Is there anything I missed you'd like to point out? Are there any theories you would like to share? If so, sound off below. Till next time, I wish you well. 

Friday, July 22, 2022

NOPE IS WORTH GETTING SUCKED INTO

 In Nope, Emerald (Keke Palmer) and OJ (Daniel Kaluuya) Haywood are horse trainers for Hollywood films. They own a ranch near an old west theme park (named Jupiter's Claim) owned and operated by Ricky "Jupe' Park and clan. The Haywood family has been in the horse training business for a long time and their lineage is lesser-known Hollywood royalty. After the Haywood patriarch “Pops” (Keith David) dies from a tragic accident, the Haywood business falls on hard times. Lucky for them (or maybe not) the star of Jupe's newest park attraction might provide a way for them to get back on top...provided they’re ok with some pretty severe collateral human loss. 

Nope is Jordan Peele's latest horror-influenced outing.  This time his brilliant mind sets its sights on spectacle, the art of it, and the effects it has on those involved. Daniel Kaluuya plays OJ (short for Otis Jr), the man left in charge of the Haywood ranch and family business after Pops passes. He is more of a quiet, reserved, and serious "dude" who is intensely focused on and devoted to his work. Kaluuya puts on a beautifully nuanced, effective, affective, powerful performance as a son who is desperately doing his best to ensure his family and it’s legacy isn’t forgotten, and failing. 

Keke Palmer is absolutely magnetic, charming, and funny as OJ's sister Emerald. Emerald makes for a fantastic contrast/opposite to OJ as she is all about "the sparkle" or "the pizazz". She is the person who feels right at home in front of the camera, while OJ is more comfortable quietly working behind the scenes. Emerald dreams of fame, and her quest for it might land the Haywoods in some pretty dire straights. Palmer is a ton of fun, and she effortlessly draws audience’s attentions whenever she is on screen.

Steven Yuen is fantastic as Ricky "Jupe" Park, the former child star and showboat-y owner of Jupiter's Claim. “Jupe” is sprinkled throughout the first two acts of Nope, but is integral to the themes and story of the flick. Behind Jupe's friendly, smiley façade lies some serious trauma, which stems from a bloody and horrific event from his days as a young actor. His character is a tragic one, as he has gone on to capitalize on the "spectacle" from his youth and perpetuates the cycle he once found himself caught in so many years ago. Yeun has been a real rising star for some years now, and his layered performance in Nope cements him as someone to keep an eye on.

Brandon Perea is incredibly likable as the down-on-his-luck and consistently disrespected Angel, a lowly tech service agent for (the now defunct) Fry's Electronics. The Haywoods call on him to assist in configuring cameras around their ranch, which they hope will capture footage of something big and horrifying in the sky. Much to their frustration, Angel is hard to get rid of once they enlist his aide. Perea is called in for some extra comic relief, and to represent more of a blue-collar layman's perspective. He essentially acts as third lead, and is a very memorable and funny addition to the film.

Along for the ride is Michael Wincott as Hollywood cinematographer Antlers Holst. The Haywoods call on him for extra help in capturing the footage they desire, and he is the first to warn them of the dangers of their quest. Wincott plays crusty and wise exceedingly well, and though he is only really in the third act, he manages to leave quite an impression.

With Nope, Peele has crafted a spectacle that is commenting on spectacle. There are themes about attention, popularity, "looking away", the careless exploitation of wild animals for profit, and the fool-hardy idea that wild animals can be trusted or tamed. Peele uses constant eye imagery and motifs to inform his commentary on spectacle as well. 

Those lining up expecting a bloody and gory film are likely to be disappointed. There isn't much blood or gore in Nope, and when it's there, it's sparingly used (the most blood you'll get is during a horrifying sequence involving the Haywood house). Nope also tends to "look away" from some of it's grislier set pieces. This is appropriate since (as previously stated) a core theme is about "looking away" from spectacle. Luckily, what we do get to see tends to be incredibly disturbing/ horrifying and will likely stick with most well after the end credits have rolled.

Nope is a good deal horrifying throughout. Whatever is in the sky is appropriately intimidating, aggressive, and expansive. The many scenes it's featured in, and the way it’s shot and handled might leave some legs trembling. Aiding in the horror department is the phenomenal and affecting sound design by Johnnie Burn and a strong score by Michael Abels. What you hear throughout the film (especially when whatever is in the sky makes itself known) is horrific and nightmare-inducing. 

Nope also looks consistently pretty, thanks to cinematography by Hoyte Van Hoytema. Most of the film has a distinct barren, desolate, "western" feel. However, the few times we get to visit Jupiter's Claim things brighten up with some lively colors and a fantastic set design (by Ruth De Jong). Expect a memorable mixture of color palettes throughout Nope, both muted and bright. 

Now, onto some negatives: Nope runs at around two hours, and it definitely feels like a two hour film. The first forty minutes or so are a little slower, as this is where characters and their relationships to each other are established. Not everyone is likely to appreciate a two hour movie, and the flick as whole does have some down-time every now and then. Luckily, Nope more than earns it's length. 

The proceedings are divided into four or so "chapters", and this is the only aspect of the film that might not have been needed. While what occurs in each "chapter" fits based upon what they’re titled,  structuring the film this way comes across as a little clunky, confusing, and odd.

Nope sees Peele in full Spielberg mode (Think Jaws and Jurassic Park). This is without a doubt his Jaws. With Nope, Peele has crafted a smart, thoughtful spectacle that has a lot to say. Not sure how much general audiences are going to dig it. It’s long, intelligent, and likely isn’t what most are expecting it to be. It’s certainly a challenging film, one that aims to make audiences consider the part they play in partaking in spectacle. 

Nope defies definition and labels. It includes horror, sci-fi (if this is an “Alien” movie it’s unlike any you’ve seen), adventure, and western elements. In the end, Nope firmly establishes Jordan Peele as one of the great directors of our time. It’s a wild, unpredictable ride (and seeing it on the largest screen you can find is a must!)! Be prepared to never look at clouds or the sky in the same way again.

4.5 STARS

Wednesday, June 22, 2022

LET’S CELEBRATE PRIDE WITH THE BIRDCAGE

Elaine May (Director of The Heartbreak Kid, co-writer for Jim Henson's Labyrinth, Heaven Can Wait, Reds, and Tootise) bounces back after the disaster that was Ishtar (which she wrote and directed) with The Birdcage. She teams back up with long-time collaborator Mike Nichols (Director of Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, The Graduate, Catch-22, Biloxi Blues, and Postcards From the Edge) to craft this American remake of La Cage Aux Folles. She penned the screenplay, and Nichols directs. The screenplay is sharp, clever, hilarious, and witty. Nichol's direction is fantastic, and he never calls attention to himself or his style.

The cast assembled is all very game for their roles. Nathan Lane (as Albert/Starina), Robin Williams (as Armand), and Hank Azaria (as Agador) are perfection in their roles. Nathan Lane as Albert/Starina remains the beating, gooey heart of the entire film. He plays a drag queen diva who hosts some insecurities regarding his body image and his relationship with Armand, the owner of the club he headlines at. Lane excels in the role, and is incredibly memorable and lovable. 

Robin Williams is tasked with playing the *ahem* straight-man to Lane's over-the-top diva. Williams is fantastic and fun as Armand. He is given some very funny material to work with despite being the more serious of the two. It's incredibly touching to see the love they both share for Armand's son, Val, and the lengths they will to go to for his happiness. Lane and Williams are perfect and unforgettable as the starring duo of the film.

Hank Azaria is also incredibly memorable as Agador, the very gay houseman who loves to wear different outlandish outfits. He's one of the most consistently funny parts of the film. Dan Futterman (perhaps best known for penning the screenplays for Capote and Foxcatcher) plays Val, Armand's son who is about to be married. The only issue is his fiance's parents are strict conservatives. At a loss, he reluctantly asks his dad and Albert to pretend to be straight for the weekend so as to impress his future in-laws. Futterman takes a character that could come across as unlikeable, and makes him very likable and even relatable. 

Calista Flockhart (best known for playing Ally McBeal on the titular TV show) plays Barbara, Val's fiance. She isn't in the film a whole lot, but comes across as very sweet and very kind. Dianne Wiest (aka Elliot's mom in E.T.) and Gene Hackman play Louise and Senator Kevin Keeley, respectively. They are the ultra-conservative parents of Barbara. It's always a joy to see Dianne Wiest on screen, and Gene Hackman shines in the third act (especially whenever he shares the screen with Nathan Lane). Christine Baranski (Best known for her roles in Cruel Intentions, Bowfinger, Dr. Seuss' How The Grinch Stole Christmas, and the Mama Mia! films) plays Katharine, Val's estranged mom, and is pretty enjoyable in her few scenes. 

The Birdcage was filmed primarily in South Beach, Miami. The Carlyle Hotel acted as the facade for the club Armand owns, and it still stands on Ocean Drive today. The many, many extras featured in the background of the movie are all fantastic, and help add life and color to the environs of the picture. 

At the end of the day, the only real complaint I have with The Birdcage is an incredibly minor and trivial one: I can't for the life of me figure out why the filmmakers chose to change Albert's stage name from Zaza (which it was in the OG film and stage musical) to Starina. Zaza is such a great, iconic name and Starina....well, I consider it a step down. That said, this is such a minor nitpick that it doesn't end up detracting anything from the overall product.

The Birdcage is a film about love, acceptance, understanding, and the lengths people will go to for the ones they love. It's a very sweet story that is still fairly powerful and poignant today. If you are looking for high-quality laughs, some touching moments, or you just want to smile and feel good...The Birdcage fits the bill. 

Side Note: The scene where the receptionist at Katharine's office is reading Nietzsche while Albert waits and applies blush is so subtly hilarious it hurts.

Monday, June 20, 2022

JURASSIC WORLD: DOMINION WON'T LET DEAD DINOSAURS LIE

 “Dodgson! Dodgson! We’ve got Dodgson here! See? Nobody cares.”


Trevorrow and crew  inherited the JP franchise, but by this third and (hopefully) final outing they have clearly run out of ideas. They fumble and stumble around, regurgitating scenes and ideas from just about every previous film (they even re-do the finale from the first Jurassic World). By this point all the magic and wonder are gone, and the last vestiges of life have been sucked dry from this once promising franchise.

Dominion suffers from a severe lack of a plot (or maybe too much plot). There are multiple twisting sub-plots that never coalesce together or amount to much of anything. The sub-plots feature a genetically engineered swarm of locusts that threaten to bring about the end of days ( That's right, we have a JP film about locusts. At least it's something different? The Dinosaurs almost act as set dressing), the kidnapping of Maisie from Fallen Kingdom, a Biosyn Dinosaur preserve where they research Dinos for pharmaceutical applications (Biosyn is the evil company that recruited Dennis Nedry in the first JP. The preserve/facility definitely reminds of the OG JP), the kidnapping of Blue's baby (whom I've nicknamed Baby Blue. This sub-plot is all but forgotten for around 90% of the film. Don't expect much Blue in Dominion either, as she's only in the first act and a scene in the last), and more. 

Colin Trevorrow is back in the director's seat and does an awful job, unable to juggle all the various sub-plots. The first two acts or so might give some people whiplash as Dominion jumps from location to location, before eventually settling down at the Biosyn preserve. There is absolutely no through-line in Dominion, and it it feels like we've seen all this done before, but better. It leads to a sense you are drowning in a sea that consists of an excess of nothing. 

The set-up that Fallen Kingdom left us with is all but ignored, which might be the most infuriating thing about Dominion. This installment had potential up the wazoo, but Trevorrow (for whatever misguided reason) thinks sticking to the same-old same-old is the best route. To think we could have had a movie about the threat of Dinosaurs living alongside humans/ humans learning to live with and survive the Dinosaurs. THAT could have been a cool time at the theaters. The big bad Dino (named the Gigantosauraus, a real Dino that actually existed) is essentially an after-thought, and isn't introduced properly until well into the third act (I will say the AA for the big bad is super impressive, though). 

The OG cast from the first JP film return (Sam Neill, Laura Dern, Jeff Goldblum, and BD Wong. Neill and Wong easily emerge as the strongest of the bunch. In fact, Wong's performance as Dr. Henry Wu might be the only consistently great thing across all the JP/JW films he appears in). Campbell Scott fills in for the role of Lewis Dodgson, and might be the weakest of the human antagonists in all of the JP/JW films. I appreciate that they chose to include the OG big bad from the first JP, unfortunately Dodgson is essentially a boring, evil Steve Jobs. 

It's nice to have the OG cast return, and their characters feel handled fairly well (They feel true to who they were in the first JP). It's appreciated that they are in the entirety of the film. Shame that Dominion waits until the final 20 minutes or so to introduce the Jurassic World main characters to the Jurassic Park main characters . 

Chris Pratt and Bryce Dallas Howard reprise their roles. They are fine, but not particularly memorable (At least Pratt looks consistently cool). Isabella Sermon returns as Maisie, and is even more grating than she was in Fallen Kingdom. DeWanda Wise (as Kayla, a cocky and cool pilot) and Mamoudou Athie (as Ramsay, one of the underlings to Dodgson) are the only memorable new actors/characters. 

The cast of characters here aren't as dumb as they were in Fallen Kingdom, but they aren't given a whole lot to do. Just about the only "great" part of Dominion is an extended Dino action scene in Malta. There isn't a whole lot of Dino action in Dominion, most of our time is spent with the human characters. The script (by Colin Trevorrow and Emily Carmichael) isn't the worst I've sampled, but definitely features some groan-worthy lines and reveals (like Ian Malcolm talking about a dog humping his leg). 

Let's hope that Dominion really is the final outing for the tired and weary JP franchise. It's been bled dry at this point, and Dominion very well might be the worst of the entire series (it's certainly the least inspired). It feels great to see the OG cast return, the practical and CGI SFX both practical and CGI mostly impress (The AA for the Giganotosaurus is very cool) , and that Malta scene is lots of fun. Unfortunately, that's about it for the good in Dominion. I really wanted to like this film. I was hoping for fun bad, but instead I got boring bad. The park is officially closed. At least we'll always have Malta.

1 STAR